The statement promotes a new Substack launch and a live conversation, aiming to counter what is described as 'right wing disinformation.' It suggests a proactive approach to engaging with public discourse.
- The statement aims to counter disinformation, which aligns with doing no harm, but the language 'flood the zone' could be seen as aggressive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The intent to counter disinformation can promote understanding, but the language used may not foster empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses strong language against a group, which may not fully support constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to influence public discourse, aiming to counter disinformation. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.