Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses a strong anti-war sentiment, criticizing politicians and their motivations for engaging in wars. It suggests that wars are driven by financial interests and calls for public dissent against potential conflicts, specifically with Iran. The accompanying image lists historical predictions about Iran's nuclear capabilities, possibly to support the argument that such threats are exaggerated or misrepresented.
- The statement aims to prevent harm by opposing war, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes political parties broadly, maintaining a level of respect for individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging skepticism towards war motivations. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism of political actions without personal attacks, aligning with constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.