Mike Johnson

The statement involves a highly charged political comparison, equating ICE with the Gestapo, which is likely intended to criticize ICE's actions and policies. This comparison is provocative and may be seen as inflammatory, potentially hindering constructive dialogue.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement may cause harm by using a historically loaded comparison, which could be seen as disrespectful to those affected by the Gestapo's actions. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The comparison may not respect the dignity of ICE agents, as it equates them with a notorious historical entity. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses a provocative analogy that may polarize rather than foster dialogue. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses a strong negative comparison rather than addressing specific issues or policies. [-2]