Mike Johnson

The statement involves a controversial comparison between ICE agents and neo-Nazis, which is a provocative and inflammatory analogy. This type of rhetoric can escalate tensions and polarize public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement may cause harm by using inflammatory language that could incite anger or fear. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The comparison could be seen as disrespectful to ICE agents, potentially violating their dignity. [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses a highly charged analogy. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and may be seen as a personal attack on ICE agents. [-2]