The statement compares the efforts of certain public figures in preventing war, suggesting that some are more effective than others. It engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of war prevention and the roles of political figures.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to polarization by framing the issue in a divisive manner. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a broad generalization about individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a comparative claim without providing evidence or context. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to make a political point but does not clearly contribute to the betterment of society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible by providing context or evidence for the claims made. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.