Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -108

The statement questions the behavior of Western leadership in relation to Israel, suggesting a lack of independence or critical stance. The tone is provocative and potentially inflammatory, using a metaphor that could be perceived as derogatory.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a metaphor that could be considered derogatory, potentially causing harm by fostering divisive or negative perceptions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the metaphor could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a provocative metaphor rather than encouraging constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a metaphor that could be seen as a personal attack on leadership rather than addressing specific policies or actions. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive, given the provocative language used. [-1]