Scott Jennings
@ScottJenningsKY
·
20d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing political factions and their approaches to foreign policy, referencing a protest related to U.S. and Iran relations. It critiques both 'hawks' and 'isolationists' for lacking reasonable approaches, suggesting a need for more balanced solutions.
- The statement does not directly harm but uses divisive language ('hawks' vs. 'isolationists') which could polarize rather than promote understanding. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks empathy and compassion, focusing on criticism without offering constructive solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques political positions but does not engage in personal attacks, maintaining a level of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.