Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement reports on a serious and potentially inflammatory international incident involving military actions. It uses strong language that could incite fear or anger, such as 'indiscriminately murder' and 'damage a larger area.' The tone is urgent and alarming, which is typical for breaking news but may also contribute to heightened tensions.
- The statement uses charged language that could contribute to harm by escalating tensions or inciting fear, thus not fully adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the language used could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those involved by using terms like 'indiscriminately murder.' [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on the violent aspects of the incident without providing context or encouraging dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents information in a one-sided manner without inviting discussion or considering multiple perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by reporting on a significant public issue, but the use of charged language may not fully align with using the platform responsibly and with integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.