The statement by retired Gen. Joseph Votel addresses military strategy and operations, specifically regarding U.S. airstrikes and the potential need for repeated strikes, which is a matter of public concern and policy. It contributes to public discourse by providing insight into military actions and their implications.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses military actions that inherently involve harm. It is neutral in this context as it is an analysis rather than an endorsement of harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of an analytical observation rather than an empathetic discourse.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a factual observation about military strategy. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to provide information on military strategy, which is responsible and informative. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.