Thomas Massie
@RepThomasMassie
·
17d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of congressional responsibility in authorizing military action, referencing constitutional requirements and critiquing the lack of action by other members of Congress.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language to criticize inaction, which could be seen as a minor violation of respectful discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of those who are silent on the issue, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to call for accountability and action from public officials, aiming to influence for the betterment of society by upholding constitutional duties. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss a significant public issue with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.