Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement reports on a significant diplomatic development involving a peace deal between Rwanda and the Congo, attributed to Donald Trump. It also references other international peace efforts and includes a comment on the Nobel Peace Prize, suggesting a perceived lack of recognition for Trump's efforts. The tone is informative but also carries an undertone of grievance regarding recognition.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it reports on a peace deal, which is inherently positive. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of international peace efforts, though it could do more to foster empathy and compassion by focusing on the impact of the peace deal on the people involved. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, though it implies a critique of the Nobel Peace Prize process. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a significant international development, contributing to public awareness of global peace efforts. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to inform the public about international diplomacy. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.