The statement addresses a significant public issue, namely the humanitarian crisis in Gaza due to a blockade, and uses strong language to emphasize the severity of the situation. It aims to draw attention to the impact of the blockade on water availability and the potential consequences for the population, particularly children.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement uses strong language ('Monster-made') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than fostering constructive dialogue. This could be considered a violation of the principle to do no harm with words.
 [-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of 'Monster-made' could be interpreted as dehumanizing, which may not fully respect the dignity of others involved in the situation.
 [-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting the dire situation in Gaza and the impact on children, which aligns with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion.
 [+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a strong accusatory tone ('Monster-made') rather than fostering a discussion or offering solutions.
 [-1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.By highlighting a humanitarian issue, the statement uses its influence to draw attention to a significant societal concern, which aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society.
 [+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principle of free speech by addressing a public issue, but the use of inflammatory language may not fully align with using the platform responsibly and with integrity.
 [-1]