Reposted by Steve Scalise
The statement is a political commentary advocating for border security measures, emphasizing the importance of legislative action to support executive decisions. It frames border security as a matter of national security and calls for Congress to act.
- The statement does not use harmful language but strongly advocates for a specific policy, which could be polarizing.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a political agenda without addressing the human aspects of border security. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not invite dialogue or constructive criticism, as it presents a one-sided view.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a policy change, which could be seen as contributing to societal betterment from the perspective of those who agree with the policy. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to advocate for a policy responsibly, though it lacks balance. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.