Asa Hutchinson

The statement expresses gratitude for actions taken by a political leader and discusses the necessity of a non-nuclear Iran for U.S. security. It acknowledges potential retaliation and mentions that Congressional approval was not required, indicating a stance on military and foreign policy issues.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement supports military action, which could be seen as harmful, but it argues for security benefits. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy but could be seen as dismissive of Congressional oversight, which might undermine democratic processes. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes a specific viewpoint on security but does not foster empathy or understanding towards Iran.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It presents a viewpoint without engaging in personal attacks, but it does not invite dialogue or address opposing views.