The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of presidential authority and congressional approval in military actions, a significant public policy and governance topic.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises a question about the legality and historical precedent of military actions, which could be seen as neutral in terms of harm.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on questioning a legal and historical precedent.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of dialogue by questioning a point made by another user, but it does not include personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by questioning a public figure's statement and using the platform to engage in a public policy discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.