The statement 'So, you follow non-“bullshit” laws, but ignore the “bullshit” ones?' is part of a broader public discourse on the rights of citizens versus non-citizens, particularly in the context of free speech and deportation policies. The tone is confrontational and challenges the consistency of applying laws based on subjective judgments of their validity.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but its confrontational tone could contribute to a divisive atmosphere.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does challenge the dignity of the person it addresses by implying hypocrisy. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on challenging the other person's stance. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of personal attack by questioning the integrity of the person's adherence to laws, rather than focusing on the argument itself. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement is part of a public discourse on free speech and uses the platform to question the application of laws, but it does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking in integrity due to its confrontational nature.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.