The statement and image engage in public discourse by discussing a legislative bill and its implications, presenting a partisan perspective. It claims to debunk myths and presents 'facts' about the bill's benefits, while criticizing the opposing party.
- The statement uses charged language that may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially causing harm by deepening partisan divides. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in partisan attacks rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks efforts to promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on partisan criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks on the opposing party. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.