The Tennessee Holler
@TheTNHoller
·
3d
The statement critiques the lack of accountability and standards in podcasting, suggesting it prioritizes clicks and provocation over responsible discourse. It contrasts this with traditional media, implying inconsistency and bias in both. The tone is critical and somewhat cynical, highlighting concerns about media integrity.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by irresponsible media practices, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but criticizes media practices, which could be seen as a form of constructive critique rather than harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of media dynamics, encouraging critical thinking about media consumption. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of media practices without personal attacks, focusing on systemic issues. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.