Mary Capone
@MaryMont317697
·
2d
The statement engages in a political debate about U.S. foreign policy with Iran, specifically addressing the actions of the Obama administration. It challenges the narrative that Democrats are solely responsible for the situation, suggesting a more nuanced view of international negotiations and financial dealings.
- The statement attempts to clarify facts, which aligns with striving to do no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses strong language ('regime is toxic') which could be seen as harsh but is directed at a government, not individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement challenges another's view without personal attacks, promoting a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.