Reposted by Bret Baier
Jake Sherman
@JakeSherman
·
96d
The statement involves a public figure commenting on international relations, specifically regarding Israel and Iran. The tone is critical and uses strong language, indicating frustration or disapproval of the actions taken during a ceasefire. The content suggests a critique of decision-making processes related to foreign policy.
- The use of strong language may not align with striving to do no harm, as it could escalate tensions or misunderstandings. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it lacks constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive feedback or engage in dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.