The statement discusses the powers of the Commander in Chief and criticizes perceived partisan reactions to the use of Article II powers. It questions the consistency of political outrage across different administrations, implying a partisan bias. The tone is critical and defensive, aiming to highlight perceived hypocrisy.
- The statement does not directly harm but could contribute to divisiveness by framing the issue in a partisan manner. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in partisan criticism, which may not promote dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of political opponents, which could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.