Reposted by Steve Scalise
The statement is a political endorsement of a legislative proposal related to border security, which is a significant public issue. It promotes a specific policy agenda and calls for action, thus engaging in public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words, but the policy it promotes could be seen as harmful to certain communities, potentially violating this principle. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the policy's implications could affect the dignity of certain groups. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on enforcement and security rather than addressing underlying issues with empathy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive dialogue with opposing views.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a specific policy agenda, which could be seen as for the betterment of society from the perspective of those who agree with it, but not necessarily for all. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to advocate for a policy, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.