Reposted by Steve Scalise
Speaker Mike Johnson
@SpeakerJohnson
·
13d
The statement is a public discourse as it discusses a significant public issue, namely military investment and defense policy. The tone is assertive and promotional, emphasizing the importance of military strength for peace. It presents a specific policy proposal, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' as a necessary investment in U.S. military capabilities.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it promotes military investment, which can be contentious. It neither aligns nor violates this principle significantly.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on military strength rather than diplomatic or peaceful solutions, which could be seen as a minor violation of this principle. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It presents a policy position without targeting individuals, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a specific policy, which the speaker believes is for the betterment of society. However, the focus on military might over other forms of peace-building could be seen as a limited view of societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to promote a policy position. It is responsible in its presentation, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.