Mike Johnson

The statement is a public discourse as it discusses a significant public issue, namely military investment and defense policy. It presents an opinion on the importance of military strength for peace and outlines specific financial allocations for defense initiatives.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm others with words, but it promotes a perspective that equates peace with military strength, which could be seen as indirectly promoting militarization.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on military strength rather than diplomatic or peaceful solutions. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not invite dialogue or constructive criticism either.
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to advocate for increased military spending, which may not align with the betterment of society if it prioritizes military over other societal needs. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion on military policy, but the responsibility and integrity of using the platform to promote military spending over other forms of peace-building can be questioned.