The statement expresses strong disapproval of a Supreme Court decision allowing states to cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. It uses emotive language to convey the perceived negative impact on healthcare access, particularly for patients and mothers.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting fear or anger, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong language that could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of those who support the ruling. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on condemnation rather than fostering dialogue or understanding. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses strong, accusatory language rather than seeking to understand or engage with opposing views. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.