The statement addresses a significant public issue, namely the conflict in Gaza and the role of the United States in it. It calls for action in the form of an arms embargo, indicating a substantive engagement with public policy and international relations.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating tensions. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm.
 [-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does attribute blame in a way that could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of those involved.
 [-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame and urgency rather than dialogue or mutual understanding.
 [-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view and does not invite discussion or consider opposing perspectives.
 [-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its platform to call for a policy change, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment, depending on one's perspective on the issue.
 [+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given the accusatory tone and lack of constructive dialogue.
 [-1]