Steve Scalise

Rank 26 of 47

Score 20

Reposted by Steve Scalise

-3

Iran knows it cannot successfully engage against the United States militarily. Its hostile government, and other anti-American forces from around the world, often employ another strategy we must be wary of: sleeper cells in the U.S. waiting to activate from within our borders.

6/26/2025, 3:35:22 PM

The statement discusses potential threats from Iran and suggests vigilance against sleeper cells within the U.S. It implies a critique of current U.S. policy and leadership, attributing blame for enabling these threats. The tone is cautionary and somewhat accusatory, aiming to raise awareness and concern about national security.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to raise awareness about potential threats, which could be seen as a precautionary measure, but it also risks inciting fear or panic without clear evidence. [-1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement could be seen as disrespectful towards Iran by labeling its government as hostile and suggesting it employs sleeper cells, which may not respect the dignity of others. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement critiques U.S. leadership, which is a form of public discourse, but it does so in a way that could be seen as accusatory rather than engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]