Jake Tapper

Rank 12 of 47

Score 103

Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅

No member of Congress unable to cognitively perform their duties should be able to hide behind their staff.

Everyday Americans see it — and I know my colleagues do as well.

Yet, my amendment was just shot down to ensure members of Congress can actually fulfill their oath of

6/26/2025, 11:05:22 PM

The statement addresses the issue of accountability and cognitive ability of Congress members, suggesting that those unable to perform their duties should not rely on staff to cover for them. It expresses frustration over a failed amendment aimed at ensuring members can fulfill their duties.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to address a perceived issue in Congress, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for accountability. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It could be interpreted as disrespectful to members of Congress who may have cognitive issues, potentially violating their privacy and dignity. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement expresses disagreement with the current situation but does not engage in personal attacks, maintaining a focus on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]