Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement addresses a contentious issue regarding the definition of antisemitism and its implications for criticism of Israel. It suggests that labeling criticism of Israel as antisemitism may actually contribute to antisemitism itself. The tone is provocative and challenges existing narratives.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially harm by conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism, which is a sensitive topic. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It may not fully respect the dignity of those who view the definition of antisemitism differently, potentially leading to misunderstandings or conflict. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it takes a strong stance without acknowledging opposing views. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, as it does not offer solutions or acknowledge the complexity of the issue. [-1]