Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement highlights a positive example of civil discourse between two media figures from different ideological backgrounds. It praises their ability to engage in a respectful and fact-based conversation, which is a valuable contribution to public discourse.
- The statement promotes a positive example of discourse, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By highlighting a respectful and fact-based conversation, the statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement praises constructive dialogue and the avoidance of personal attacks, aligning with this principle. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By showcasing a positive example of discourse, the statement uses influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and responsible use of platforms by promoting civil discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.