Reposted by Elon Musk
The statement critiques the allocation of public subsidies to large, established companies, suggesting these funds are not being used to foster innovation or serve the national interest. It implies that these companies are benefiting from their existing dominance rather than contributing to societal advancement.
- The statement aims to highlight potential misuse of public funds, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for better allocation of resources. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by bringing attention to the issue of subsidies and their impact on innovation and public interest. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of current subsidy practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning the effectiveness of subsidies, it uses influence to potentially advocate for policy change that could benefit society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.