Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement appears to engage in public discourse as it comments on the shifting public perception and debate surrounding Zionism and Israel, which are significant societal and political issues. The tone is assertive and encourages further action or discussion on the topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the encouragement to 'go harder' could be interpreted as promoting aggressive discourse, which may indirectly lead to harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the tone could potentially incite divisive or aggressive rhetoric. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it lacks a constructive or empathetic approach to the issue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it lacks specific arguments or engagement with opposing views. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech to express an opinion on a public issue, but the encouragement to 'go harder' may not align with responsible use of influence. [-1]