Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement reports on a public feud between President Trump and Elon Musk, touching on political actions and threats that have implications for public policy and governance. It involves substantive engagement with public issues, such as the GOP megabill and the potential formation of a new political party, which are relevant to civic dialogue.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but it reports on actions and threats that could be harmful, such as using government power for personal vendettas. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public figures and their political actions, not engaging in cyberbullying or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it highlights conflict and threats rather than dialogue or resolution. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement reports on personal attacks and threats rather than constructive criticism or dialogue, which violates this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement highlights the use of influence for personal or political gain rather than societal betterment, which is a negative aspect. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on public figures' actions and statements, but the content of those actions may not align with responsible use of influence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.