Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses potential logistical issues affecting a vote, which is part of a broader conversation about legislative processes and deadlines. It touches on public discourse as it relates to governance and legislative actions.
- The statement does not use harmful language and is neutral in tone. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on logistical issues rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does provide information that could be useful for understanding the situation.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication of a mistake in the statement, so this principle is not applicable.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to inform about potential issues affecting a public process, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society by promoting transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.