Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 118
7/2/2025, 3:59:00 PM
X
In reply to:
Tim Estes
@twestes
·
18d
@AdamThierer Dripping with self importance and self righteousness @AdamThierer

We have no need to engage you. You guys are bought and paid for and no amount of words or long form article can change that. That’s why you lost and that’s why you are going to keep on losing.
Adam Thierer
@AdamThierer
·
18d
The Continuing Tech Policy Realignment on the Right

Much of Jason Hausenloy’s analysis in his essays on the “The Populist Awakening on AI” and the Right’s ongoing tech realignment reflect much of what I’ve been witnessing and writing about lately. Importantly, he points out how

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a societal issue related to technology policy and its impact. The tone is critical but not overtly hostile, aiming to highlight a perceived bias in an essay discussing tech policy realignment.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language but criticizes the essay's dismissive tone, which could be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by pointing out the importance of recognizing the destructive potential of unchecked technology, aligning with the principle of promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by focusing on the content of the essay rather than attacking individuals, adhering to the principle of avoiding personal attacks. [+1]