In reply to:
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
56d
The statement involves a discussion about public policy, specifically regarding Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, which are significant public issues. The tone is critical and highlights a discrepancy between President Trump's advice and the actions of Congress.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights a potential policy issue that could affect public welfare.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by pointing out a contradiction in policy discussions, encouraging public awareness. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting a policy inconsistency without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to a significant public policy issue, potentially contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing a public policy issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.