Nathan J Robinson
@NathanJRobinson
·
48d
The statement and accompanying conversation involve a debate about privilege and the semantics of being 'born advantaged.' The tone is defensive and somewhat sarcastic, with a focus on clarifying personal background and addressing perceived misrepresentations.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it includes sarcasm and dismissive language. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it involves name-calling and a dismissive tone. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it includes sarcasm and personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.