The statement critiques the lack of factual counterarguments in a discussion about tax cuts and deficits, referencing past promises by political figures. It implies skepticism towards arguments based on feelings rather than facts.
- The statement does not directly harm but dismisses opposing views as lacking factual basis, which could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on discrediting opposing views without engaging constructively. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but dismisses opposing views without constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.