Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and image discuss a strategic shift in political positioning by Democrats to adopt more conservative immigration policies to gain voter credibility. This reflects on public discourse about political strategy and policy adaptation.
- The statement does not directly harm but suggests a strategic compromise that may affect certain groups negatively. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It lacks empathy towards migrants by suggesting restrictive policies, focusing instead on political gain. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue by acknowledging differing views but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.