Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a serious public issue, namely the deadly flash floods in Texas and the alleged lack of preparedness due to administrative decisions. It criticizes the Trump administration for understaffing federal agencies by removing climate science experts, which purportedly led to a failure in timely evacuation warnings. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to hold the administration accountable for the disaster's impact.
- The statement aims to highlight harm caused by administrative actions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for accountability. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as harshly critical, potentially bordering on disrespectful towards the administration. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of the administration, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to improvements, but it risks being perceived as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to address a significant societal issue, potentially contributing to public awareness and dialogue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.