Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critical commentary on the Democratic Party and its members, specifically targeting Zohran Mamdani and the party's stance on issues like the situation in Gaza. It uses strong language to express disapproval and suggests a shift in political alignment.
- The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful, particularly in its accusation of genocide, which is a serious charge. This could incite anger or hostility, thus violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of terms like 'irredeemable neoliberal abomination' is harsh and could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a divisive stance, which could further polarize opinions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses strong, accusatory language without offering a platform for discussion or understanding. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence opinions against the Democratic Party, but it does so in a way that is not necessarily for the betterment of society, as it lacks constructive elements. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that could be considered irresponsible due to its accusatory and divisive nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.