The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the ethical implications of withholding a potentially damaging interview with a presidential candidate. It questions the responsibility of media in influencing public perception and election outcomes.
- The statement questions the ethical responsibility of media, implying potential harm in withholding information, but does not directly cause harm itself.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by not disclosing specific details of the interview but raises concerns about transparency.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of media practices, questioning the integrity and potential bias in withholding information. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.