In reply to:
Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley
@RepPressley
·
48d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the I-90 project, a public infrastructure issue, and its potential impact on the Allston Brighton community. It criticizes political opposition and emphasizes the importance of the project for local residents.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language against political opponents, which could be seen as divisive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of the project's importance for community infrastructure and safety, fostering empathy for affected residents. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes 'extremist Republicans' without engaging in constructive dialogue, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by supporting infrastructure improvements. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a political stance and advocating for community interests. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.