Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is highly charged and accusatory, using strong language to criticize political figures and parties. It accuses them of supporting genocide and uses terms like 'war criminal' and 'concentration camps,' which are inflammatory and could be seen as hyperbolic. The intent appears to be to provoke a strong emotional reaction and to criticize U.S. political support for Israel.
- The statement uses inflammatory language that could contribute to harm rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of the individuals mentioned, using terms like 'war criminal' without substantiated evidence in this context. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The language used is not conducive to promoting understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and polarizing. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism but rather uses personal attacks and broad generalizations. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.