The statement addresses accusations of bias and censorship on Substack, defending the independence of writers and rejecting responsibility for another person's actions. It uses a dismissive tone, calling the accusation 'asinine' and 'absurd.'
- The statement uses dismissive language, which may not promote understanding or empathy, slightly violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not engaging in personal attacks, aligning with the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it dismisses the criticism without addressing the underlying concern, slightly violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.