Jill Stien

Rank 34 of 47
|
Score -49

The statement expresses frustration and criticism towards the LAPD's actions against journalists, highlighting a court decision as necessary to protect press freedom. It engages with public issues related to law enforcement practices and press rights.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but criticizes harmful actions by the LAPD, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of the issue by highlighting the court's decision, fostering awareness of press rights. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement criticizes the LAPD's actions without engaging in personal attacks, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By drawing attention to the issue, the statement uses influence to advocate for press freedom and accountability. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly criticizing public authority actions. [+1]