Jill Stien

The statement criticizes U.S. foreign policy, suggesting hypocrisy in its treatment of different leaders. It implies political motivations behind sanctions and accuses the U.S. of inconsistency in its justice claims.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes political actions and policies.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote understanding of perceived inconsistencies in U.S. policy, though it does so in a confrontational manner.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   It engages in criticism of U.S. policy but does not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]