Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement addresses public issues related to medical debt and government financial priorities, suggesting a critique of policy decisions and societal values. It implies that the allocation of financial resources reflects priorities that may not align with the needs of working people, thus engaging in public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others but critiques systemic issues, aligning with the principle of doing no harm.Ā [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting disparities in financial priorities, encouraging empathy for those burdened by medical debt.Ā [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in critique of policy rather than personal attacks, aligning with constructive dialogue.Ā [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight societal issues, aiming for the betterment of society by questioning financial priorities.Ā [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing public policy decisions.Ā [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.