Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement presents a critical perspective on political motivations behind the release of the Epstein list, suggesting that both parties are complicit in protecting wealthy individuals. It implies a lack of genuine intent from Democrats and accuses Republicans of obstruction, framing the issue as a bipartisan failure to address accountability.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but implies wrongdoing by political parties, which could contribute to public cynicism. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech but makes broad accusations against political groups.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticizing political motives without offering constructive solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes accusatory claims without evidence, which could be seen as a form of ad hominem attack against political parties. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight perceived political hypocrisy, which could be seen as an attempt to hold parties accountable, but it lacks a constructive approach.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not fully uphold responsibility and integrity, as it makes unsubstantiated claims. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.