Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques the concept of 'toxic empathy' by labeling it as reactionary, suggesting it is an unnecessary or exaggerated term. The tone is dismissive and critical, aimed at those who use or promote the phrase. The accompanying image references a New York Times opinion piece discussing the influence of 'toxic empathy' on political and religious dynamics, indicating a broader societal debate.
- The statement does not directly harm but uses a dismissive tone that could be seen as undermining constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses a concept without engaging in a deeper discussion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a dismissive tone rather than exploring the concept critically. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.